During
the last three years, ICSW has conducted extensive consultations
to identify priority actions upon which we should seek agreement
by the United Nations General Assembly, when it meets in Geneva
in June to review implementation of the 1995 World Summit
for Social Development (the Copenhagen Summit).
We have developed a Three-Point Plan for Geneva 2000, which
includes:
An International Anti-Poverty Pact
The Copenhagen Summit identified a number
of specific anti-poverty targets but they were not given great
prominence in the final agreement. In the following year,
however, the OECD, comprising the major donor countries, agreed
on a number of International Development Targets (IDTs) for
achievement by the year 2015.
The IDTs focus on:
These
targets cannot be met without substantial commitments of resources
and other support by the wealthier countries and the international
financial institutions that they control. Since they established
the targets they should provide adequate support to achieve
them.
If they do not do so, the targets will rapidly
be seen as unfair and unattainable impositions on developing
countries, rather than as realistic and reciprocal commitments
by all members of the international community.
This concept of reciprocal commitments could
be implemented by establishing an international Anti-Poverty
Pact between developed and developing countries, and international
financial institutions. The Pact would involve commitments
to inputs, as well as to the outcomes specified in the IDTs.
The agreed inputs could include timetables
for improving debt relief, for achieving the 0.7% of GDP target
for official aid, for increasing support from key international
financial institutions, and for implementing the 20:20 principle
on basic social services.
A coordinated system of national taxes
on international financial transactions and some other international
services could be adopted, with the proceeds being earmarked
by donor and developing countries to finance their commitments
to the Pact. The Pact could also include specific forms of
financial regulation, to improve developing countries
access to sustainable levels of productive financial investment
rather than damagingly volatile speculation. Other possible
elements relate to anti-corruption measures, reductions in
military expenditure and fair trade codes.
Governments should agree in Geneva the
key elements to be included in the Pact and should establish
an independent task force to prepare a detailed draft for
consideration and finalisation at the Millennium Session of
the General Assembly later this year. ECOSOC should be principally
responsible for facilitating and monitoring implementation
of the Pact, and the General Assembly should agree to review
its implementation on International Poverty Day each year
(October 17).
International Standards for Social Development
Governments should agree in Geneva to support
progressive development by ECOSOC of a broad-based framework
of International Standards for Social Development (ISSDs)
that address key aspects of both economic and social policy
and practice.
The UN Charter clearly gives ECOSOC the
powers to develop ISSDs and many have already been agreed,
including a number of human rights treaties and ILO conventions.
But much more action is necessary.
First, existing standards that are of special
value and importance could be included, without modification,
in a special new framework of ISSDs. Under the supervision
of ECOSOC, special priority should be given within the UN
and national government systems to monitoring and enforcing
implementation of these ISSDs.
Second, other agreements could be modified
before their inclusion. This could involve, for example, developing
explicit variations according to national or regional circumstances.
Third, ISSDs should cover key aspects of
issues such as taxation, financial regulation, and business
conduct, which have substantial impacts on social development.
ECOSOC could nominate particular intergovernmental
organisations (individually or jointly) to prepare draft Standards
in specified areas, for final authorisation by ECOSOC itself.
This would provide a flexible framework within which, for
example, standards in an area that impacts on trade, the environment,
labour and basic human needs could be drafted and finalised
in a cooperative and balanced manner.
The World Bank and IMF recently requested
ECOSOC to develop agreed sets of principles and practices
for social policy. This strengthens the case for it to take
the initiative in developing and overseeing a framework of
ISSDs. It is essential, however, that the Standards recognise
legitimate scope for variation according to national circumstances
and that they are accompanied by an Anti-Poverty Pact that
guarantees provision of resources and other support from wealthy
countries.
Strengthening ECOSOC
ECOSOC is uniquely qualified to play the
leading role in international economic and social policy that
is vested in it by the UN Charter. It represents all countries
rather than being controlled by those which are rich and powerful;
its mandate covers both economic and social issues; and it
has ultimate responsibility for many of the relevant intergovernmental
agencies.
To date, however, ECOSOC has largely failed
to fulfil its responsibilities and realise its potential.
This is due partly to sustained opposition from the major
economic powers and partly to lack of pragmatic determination
by the developing countries, which have most to gain if it
becomes more effective.
ECOSOC must either strengthen the size, role
and effectiveness of its five-person executive committee,
or develop some other mechanism that enables prompt, focused
and vigorous action to be taken without calling a full Council
meeting of more than 50 members. A grouping of up to about
20 members could be selected from regional constituencies
to reflect modern realities and genuine commonality of interest.
Effective use must be made of the opportunities
that have developed in recent years for greater interaction
with the leaders of the World Bank, IMF and WTO. ECOSOC must
also engage closely with newer groupings, such as the G-20,
which may acquire major global significance.
ECOSOC should also engage more closely with
regional groupings outside the UN system. Groupings such as
the European Union, Southern African Development Community
and Association of South East Asian Nations are usually regarded
as much more significant by the highest levels of government.
Stronger regional interaction through these groupings could
help to balance the benefits and imperatives of internationalisation
with the need for flexibility and sensitivity to local circumstances
and cultures. These groupings need to operate within an effective
global framework, of the kind that ECOSOC should provide.
A useful step in that direction would be for ECOSOC to establish
an annual regional consultation, within the annual Council
meeting.
Governments in Geneva should endorse changes
to enable ECOSOC to fulfil its important Charter responsibilities,
including development and oversight of the proposed Anti-Poverty
Pact and International Standards for Social Development.

JULIAN
DISNEY
President
International Council on Social Welfare