The
International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW) is a global organisation
which represents tens of thousands of civil society organisations
in more than eighty countries throughout the world. Since the
World Summit for Social Development in Copenhagen in 1995, ICSW
has organised more than twenty global and regional forums to assess
and promote implementation of the Summit commitments. These forums
have been attended by thousands of participants from civil society
in more than sixty countries from every region of the world.
Eight priority areas for international
action have emerged from this extensive world-wide series of forums
and from other consultations within civil society, including at
meetings of the UN Commission for Social Development and of the
Preparatory Committee for the UN General Assembly Special Session
on Copenhagen implementation. The priority areas are described
in this paper, together with a summary of some of the specific
initiatives which participants in the forums have proposed for
implementation of the Copenhagen commitments.
1.
THE ECOSOC SYSTEM
Despite some improvements since the Copenhagen Summit, much
greater progress needs to be made in strengthening the structures
and processes of the Economic and Social Council. This applies
especially to strengthening the composition of ECOSOC, its effectiveness
at the regional and sub-regional levels, and its relationships
with major economic organisations such as the World Bank, International
Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organisation. Changes of this
kind should be seen as essential elements of a new international
financial architecture.
2. INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
The Copenhagen Summit far-sightedly agreed that action should
be taken to reduce the excessive volume and volatility of speculative
activity in international financial markets. The subsequent
failure to implement this commitment has had devastating consequences
on economic and social development, especially in East Asia
and Latin America. The Special Session should now identify and
promote specific reforms in this area rather than leaving it
to the finance ministries and international financial institutions
which for so long denied there was a problem and continue even
now to understate its extent.
3. GLOBAL ANTI-POVERTY PROJECT
As agreed at Copenhagen, all governments should set specific
targets, and adopt strategies, for eradicating absolute poverty
and reducing relative poverty. Top priority should be given
to achieving specific targets in relation to basic income, health,
education, and access to water and food. The Special Session
should agree on a few specific and achievable targets in these
areas, such as the International Development Targets of the
OECD, and should secure specific commitments by developed countries
and international financial institutions about ways in which
they will help developing countries to achieve these targets.
4. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
The Copenhagen Summit made vague commitments in relation to
reversing the recent decline in Official Development Assistance
(ODA), enhancing debt relief for countries in the greatest hardship,
and applying the 20/20 principle. The Special Session should
agree on specific initiatives which would achieve substantial
progress in the directions outlined at the Summit and would
honour the commitment to improve the effectiveness of aid programmes
in meeting locally-identified needs.
5. BASIC INCOME SUPPORT
The Copenhagen Summit agreed that basic income support should
be provided to individuals and families in periods of special
hardship or vulnerability. The Special Session should adopt
specific initiatives for strengthening income support systems
around the world, including extension wherever possible to people
who are self-employed, employed or in the rural or informal
sectors. Attention should be given to microcredit and subsidised
savings as well as to social security and other conventional
income support systems.
6. TAXATION
The Copenhagen Summit agreed on the need for progressive, fair
and efficient taxation systems which raise sufficient revenue
for national and international purposes. It emphasised the importance
of adequate and equitable taxation of assets and of international
transactions. The Special Session should identify and promote
reforms aimed at achieving these goals at both national and
international levels. This should include development of a code
of international guidelines for the design and administration
of national taxation systems.
7. FAIR TRADE AND INVESTMENT
The Copenhagen Summit agreed on the need for regulation to ensure
fair competition and ethical responsibilities in international
business activities. It also agreed on the need to assess and
enhance the impact of free trade negotiations on developing
countries. Little progress has been made in these respects since
the Summit. The Special Session should initiate processes for
developing a binding code of rights and responsibilities in
the conduct of international trade and investment. The code
should incorporate appropriate core standards of the International
Labour Organisation.
8. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS
It was agreed in Copenhagen that greater efforts should be made
to secure ratification and observance of the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Special Session
should identify and endorse specific initiatives for improving
the effectiveness of the Covenant and for improving linkage
between the Covenant and the specific standards and targets
which were endorsed at the Copenhagen Summit.
|