Introduction

Two fundamental principles were agreed at the Copenhagen Summit on Social Development in 1995. The first principle is that sustainable* social progress cannot be achieved without creating and maintaining environments at both national and international levels which will enable such progress. The Summit agreements emphasised especially the importance in this context of developing such enabling environments in the fields of politics, economics, law and culture.
The second principle is that sustainable social progress and sustainable economic development are mutually interdependent. While economic development is necessary to expand resources and opportunities for social progress, so social progress is necessary to nurture and preserve economic development. The Summit also recognised that short-term economic growth does not necessarily produce sustainable economic development, especially if economic growth is measured only by reference to so-called gross domestic product.

The Copenhagen Summit was a very rare event by reason of the breadth of issues which it considered, the range of governments and other organisations which were involved at a high level, and the degree to which economic issues were considered from a relatively comprehensive range of perspectives and interests. These factors contributed substantially to the Summit being, as is now widely acknowledged, somewhat “ahead of its time”.

Only two years after the Summit the validity and importance of the two fundamental principles referred to above, were starkly demonstrated by the series of financial market failures across the world. Yet they continue to receive little more than lip service, at best, from many of the most powerful policy-makers and actors in international spheres. This applies especially amongst leaders of the wealthiest countries and multinational corporations.

It is important that major international gatherings of a rare nature, such as the Copenhagen Summit and the follow-up meeting in 2000 of the UN General Assembly, focus especially on macro-issues and on fundamental, long-term responses to them. It is also important that they focus especially on developing and pursuing specific options for international action on these issues. They should not be diverted into concentrating principally on meso- or micro-level issues, short-term responses, vague exhortations or false promises. They also should not deny or obscure the extent to which developing countries, in particular, need international cooperation to enable them to pursue the necessary actions at their own level.

This paper looks at three major areas in which a greater degree of international cooperation is desirable in order to promote sustainable social progress throughout the world, especially in developing countries. The proposals involve international cooperation aimed at

  • strengthening governance;
  • strengthening standards;
  • strengthening targets and resources.

The proposals have been drawn largely from discussions at a series of more than thirty global and regional forums, involving more than a thousand civil society organisations, which have been organised by the International Council on Social Welfare since the Copenhagen Summit.


* “Sustainable” is used in this paper to describe something which is likely to be maintained over the longer term rather
than as a reference to the narrower, albeit important, concept of ecological sustainability.