At
the fourth Preparatory Committee held in New York, January 2002,
for the International Conference on Financing for Development,
opposing perspectives were presented by different Members States
on the components and reforms required to harness the financial
resources necessary to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.
Excerpts from official statements highlighting these different
views are presented below.
 |
United
States
Edited
from the statement delivered by Ambassador John D. Negroponte,
United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations
|
Distinguished
Co-Chairman, fellow delegates: President Bush said in his address
to the World Bank last July, A world where some live in
comfort and plenty, while half of the human race lives on less
than $2 a day is neither just, nor stable. In the spirit
of the Presidents remarks, the United States approaches
this conference as a moral and political as well as an economic
challenge.
Development requires liberty, it requires fairness, it requires
openness, it requires compassion, and it requires the recognition
that the domestic private sector not national or foreign
governments is the most efficient, powerful and reliable
source of future growth any country can have.
The United States therefore believes that a major theme of the
Financing for Development Conference should be that major domestic
resources are the basic foundation for a countrys development.
During the past forty years, countries that have successfully
promoted their economic growth and development have done so
through improvements in their domestic economic policy environments
and openness to trade. This means a commitment to increased
private investment, increased institutional capacity, political
and economic stability, regulatory transparency, and a level
playing field for all market participants.
In the 1990s, for example, the World Bank found that those developing
countries that integrated with the global economy enjoyed a
5.1 percent increase in per capita income. Those countries that
did not integrate suffered a drop of almost 2 percent in their
per capita income growth. In a word, commerce and trade are
the linchpins for development.
It is domestic private capital and open markets that provide
the major muscle to move societies into the modern world, but
where domestic resources are too constrained to achieve near-term
success, developing countries must do the right thing to tap
foreign sources of funds. Again, the major sources are in the
private sector.
 |
Japan
Edited
from the statement delivered by H.E. Mr. Minoru Kubota,
Special Advisor to the Minister for Foreign Affairs |
Mr.
and Madam Co-Chairpersons, distinguished delegates, In my view,
to secure financing for development, developing countries themselves
must above all exercise ownership. Without it, cooperation by
development partners will never bear fruit. Through its ODA
programme, Japan has extended support to those countries that
have acted on the basis of the principle of ownership. Japan
regards education, especially basic education as a priority
area in the development of social infrastructure and the achievement
of poverty eradication and sustainable development. The starting
point, however, should be for developing countries to do their
utmost to promote development.
The outcome document should contain realistic and achievable
recommendations. The quality of the outcome document will have
an impact on the reputation that the United Nations has won
in the area of development. In this regard, let me emphasise
that in our discussions on specific subjects such as international
trade, finances, debt and aid coordination, we should respect
the expertise of specialised organs such as the World Trade
Organisation, the Bretton Woods institutions, the Paris Club
and OECD-DAC.
 |
Venezuela
Edited
from the statement delivered by Ambassador Milos Alcalay,
Permanent Representative of Venezuela to the United Nations
and Chairman of the Group of 77 |
Chairperson,
The Group of 77 and China have always underlined the cardinal
principle that countries have the primary responsibility for
their economic development. Domestic resources are the principal
source and the primary means to finance development activities
in any country. Nevertheless, in a globalised world where interdependence
has become a prominent factor, the most important and major
factor in mobilising domestic financial resources for development
is the need for a supportive and conducive international environment.
Trade is the most important and multidimensional mechanism for
almost all developing countries to mobilise and expand their
resource base, both domestic and external, for financing for
development. Trade is also the major instrument for integration
in the international economy. The Group of 77 and China believes
that an open, rule-based, transparent and non-discriminatory
and predictable multilateral trading system is an essential
component for the global economic system and would contribute
profoundly to world economic growth and to the smooth integration
of developing countries into the world economy.
The Group of 77 and China believe that development has a direct
relation with trade and it should be substantially addressed
in institutional arrangements and trade negotiations. Trade
barriers, subsidies and other trade distorting measures particularly
in agriculture, textile and steel have adverse impacts on the
ability of many developing countries to exploit their comparative
advantage and seriously constrains their ability to mobilise
necessary resources for development. They should therefore be
abolished.
The Group of 77 and China believes that as an urgent priority,
ODA should be increased to the annual equivalent of 0.7 percent
of GNP of developed countries. The ownership of development
assistance by the recipient countries should be ensured and
the developing countries should control the design, implementation
and evaluation of development assistance programmes.
External debt is a crucial challenge for almost all developing
countries. Some mechanisms and measures have been introduced
to mitigate the adverse impact of external debt on developing
countries. Nevertheless, evidence clearly indicates that there
are grave shortcomings in the existing international initiatives
for resolution of debt problems of developing countries. These
shortcomings need to be addressed.
The Group of 77 and China would like to underline that enhancing
the coherence and consistency of the international monetary,
financial and trading systems in support of development should
be a paramount objective of the financing for development process.
We firmly believe that a major challenge before the world community
is to construct an international financial system that is responsive
to the priorities of growth and development on a global level,
particularly in developing countries, and that is geared to
the promotion of economic and social equity.
For
the full text of these statements, go to: www.un.org/esa/ffd/delPC0102.htm
 |
Bangladesh
Edited
from the statement delivered by H.E. Dr. Iftekhar Ahmed
Chowdhury, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of
Bangladesh to the United Nations. |
The
International Conference on Financing for Development will be
an event of crucial importance for developing countries especially
for the category known as the least developed countries (LDCs).
People of the LDCs, who constitute over 600 million, survive
on the margins of existence, most earning less than US $1 a
day and who are structurally unable to mainstream themselves
into the development process.
The UN Conferences of the 1990s including the Millennium Conference
have sought to reduce poverty by half by 2015. This aim, though
grand, is achievable. But for this we will need concerted action
by developed and developing countries, and governments and civil
society. International commitments, including those in the areas
of ODA, debt relief, FDI inflows, market-access and capacity
building, must be kept.
Clearly, poverty alleviation continues to be and must indeed
be the main focus of our work in combination with social and
human development. Like other developing countries, the LDCs
remain seriously cash-strapped. A massive increase of public
and private capital flows to these economies is essential. The
Millennium Declaration, which recognised this, also includes
the commitment to grant more generous development assistance,
especially to those that are genuinely making efforts to apply
their resources to poverty alleviation. The Secretary-General
in his report on the work of the organisation to the current
General Assembly stressed the pivotal roles of agriculture,
institutions and institutional change in the development process.
These also need to be incorporated into the Financing for Development
outcome.

|