December 1997, Vol. 1, No 6



 
Features:
  • Towards a Holistic Approach to Human Rights.  By Sakiko Fukuda-Parr.
  • Under the Human Rights Umbrella.  By Phillip Alston.
  • Thematic Supplemen on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
 

available online - Subscription Form - available online



INTRODUCTION

     THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL on Social Welfare (ICSW) has long believed that regular meetings and specific cooperative action at the regional and sub-regional levels would be essential for effective implementation of the World Summit for Social Development (WSSD). We were pleased, therefore, that the Summit agreements in 1995 proposed that Ministerial meetings should be held every two years at regional level in order to assess and facilitate implementation.

    The first of these meetings was held in the Latin American region in April 1997. As described in the June 1996 issue of Social Development Review, the United Nations' Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) prepared excellent background papers which demonstrated that in many countries of the region economic growth had been accompanied by greater economic and social inequity. The meeting of Ministers, however, failed to take full advantage of the opportunity for detailed informal discussion or specific agreement. Perhaps greater progress will be made at the next meeting, scheduled for 1999.
The second regional Ministerial meeting was held in Nov. 1997 in the Asia Pacific region. Again it had the benefit of excellent background papers, prepared on this occasion by the UN's Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). This included a detailed list of key targets for various aspects of social development which have been adopted at intergovernmental meetings. As in Sao Paulo, the meeting format did not allow sufficient opportunities for detailed and informal discussion at the Ministerial level. However, the final statement included a number of important agreements.

  

     A strong theme of the meeting was the need for accelerated implementation of the WSSD agreements and ESCAP's own regional agenda for social development which was agreed in 1994. Accordingly, the Ministers agreed on intermediate regional targets in areas for which longer targets had previously been agreed. For example, targets were adopted of reducing absolute poverty and infant mortality by 2000 to half of the levels which prevailed in 1990. The meeting also agreed to bring forward some target dates in relation to education and women.

In light of the economic crisis which has been precipitated in Asia in recent months, it is perhaps not surprising that the Manila meeting emphasised the dangers for social development of excessive volatility and misjudgment in the international financial markets. While the causes of the Asian crisis lie partly in the actions of governments, it has been greatly exacerbated by the tendency for the markets to be seduced for too long by simplistic measures of economic development and thereby to encourage the very weaknesses in public policy and private sector behaviour which they eventually punish too late and too savagely.

 

     Unfortunately, the Manila meeting did not take the opportunity to develop detailed proposals for achieving the enabling international economic environment which was emphasised in the WSSD agreements. In this region, as elsewhere in the world, social policy ministers seem unduly reluctant publicly to emphasise the damage which misguided economic policies are causing in their areas of responsibility and to identify directions for reform.

  

     Two other striking features of the Manila agreements are also of special relevance in other regions. First, the agreements give special emphasis to the importance for social development of action by, and cooperation between, sub-regional intergovernmental organisations. In the Asia Pacific region, these include the Association of South East Asian Nations and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation. ICSW has advocated this point repeatedly as being applicable in every part of the world.

  

      The second feature is the prominence and support which the Ministers gave in their discussions and in their final statement to the Message to Manila (see pg. 12) which was endorsed by a regional NGO Forum held two months previously in Kuala Lumpur. This applies especially to the Priority Plan to the Year 2000 which was included in the Message to Manila and proposed ten priority measures, many of which involved addressing the underlying causes of poverty and hardship.

  

      The NGO Forum in Kuala Lumpur was initiated by ICSW and hosted by our member, the Malaysian Council on Social Welfare. ESCAP was invited to be the other principal organiser and it worked closely and cooperatively with the more than 100 NGOs from 27 countries which attended the meeting. Other special assistance was provided by the Australian Council for Overseas Aid, AusAID and the Asian Development Bank. We were delighted also with the support given by the Philippines Government, as hosts of the Ministerial meeting, when ICSW's regional president made a formal presentation of the Message to Manila at the meeting.

  

      ICSW will continue to seek similar Ministerial Meetings on WSSD follow-up in other regions, especially Africa, and to organise NGO Forums in conjunction with them. We are pleased that in both the Latin America and the Asia Pacific regions it has been agreed that a second biennial meeting will be held in 1999. These regional meetings, preceded by sub-regional activities, are crucial if the global review of the WSSD scheduled for the year 2000 is to be effective. We hope that they will be given a central role in the preparations for that review.

  
 
JULIAN DISNEY 
President 
International Council on Social Welfare