|
Mr.
Nigel Tarling

International Council on Social Welfare
(ICSW)
Overview of the Copenhagen Summit
and the UN Review Process
Mr. Nigel Tarling began by stating that
the World Summit for Social Development (WSSD) had been signed in
Copenhagen in 1995, with 186 governmental delegations in which 117
Heads of State or Government were present. It was the first time
that such a large number of governments from across the globe had
gathered to agree targets for advancing social development. It came
at a time when similar UN Summits were addressing other major issues
such as the environment (Rio), population (Cairo) and women (Beijing).
As with other Summits, the WSSD set a series of ambitious targets,
and then agreed to review the implementation of the agreements after
a period of five years.
Mr. Tarling explained how the meeting in
Baku would feed into the review process, first of all into the Ministerial
meeting in Ashgabat in November 1999, but then also into the main
UN review process which ends in June 2000 at a special session of
the UN General Assembly in Geneva. The views and recommendations
made at the Baku meeting were therefore important in reflecting
the views of civil society in the Central Asian and Caucasus region.
Whilst the targets set in the World
Summit for Social Development were relevant to all parts of the
world, there would be a number of commitments which would be specifically
important to the region. Mr. Tarling explained that there were ten
main commitments in the Copenhagen Declaration which were agreed
at the World Summit for Social Development and that under each commitment
was a programme of action which was also agreed to at the Summit
(see commitments).
Mr. Tarling believed that the four
main commitments of The Enabling Environment, Unemployment,
Poverty Alleviation, and Social Exclusion
were of particular importance to the Central Asian and Caucasus
region.
Commitment 1 aims to create an enabling
economic, political, social, cultural and legal environment that
will enable people to achieve social development. Mr. Tarling believed
that the great changes and difficulties faced by governments in
the Central Asian and Caucasus region had led to problems achieving
many of the targets mentioned in this commitment. In particular,
the creation of an economic environment that promises more equitable
access to income, resources and social services, and enhances financial
and currency stability had been difficult to achieve. Whilst the
promotion of equality and equity for all women and men were agreed
goals in many countries, the financial crises of recent years had
left many women, and female-headed households in severe difficulties.
Commitment 1 also called for transparent and accountable government
with full public participation at national and local levels. This
was clearly not happening in many countries in the region.
Commitment
2 set the ambitious goal of eradicating poverty in the world through
decisive national actions and international co-operation, as an
ethical, social, political and economic imperative. Mr. Tarling
stated that he looked forward to discussions on this subject later
on during the meeting, because poverty was not simply linked to
employment, but to the ability to access services such as health
care, food and education, all of which had been under severe strain
in the region.
Commitment 3 is particularly relevant
to the Central Asian and Caucasus region. This is the commitment
to promote the goal of full employment as a basic priority of economic
and social policies, and to enable all people to attain secure and
sustainable livelihoods through freely chosen productive employment
and work. The issue of unemployment and under-employment was key
in the region. The collapse of the Soviet Union and many of the
industries and agricultural production in the newly formed independent
countries had led to mass unemployment, with some regions and towns
having unemployment rates as high as 90%. In addition, there was
a major problem of underemployment with people continuing to be
employed but neither producing anything nor receiving wages. Commitment
3 calls for putting employment generation at the centre of government
policies, especially to combat long term unemployment and under-employment
amongst young people, women, people with disabilities and other
disadvantaged groups. It also called for improving working opportunities,
including innovative options for generating income, with special
attention to self-employment, small and medium sized enterprises,
and the informal sector.
Mr. Tarling went on to state that
Commitment 4 was also of importance to countries in the region.
This is a commitment to promote social integration by fostering
societies that are stable, safe and just, and are based on the promotion
and protection of all human rights, and on non-discrimination, tolerance,
respect for diversity, equality of opportunity, solidarity, security
and participation of all people including disadvantaged and vulnerable
groups and persons. Mr. Tarling noted that action within this commitment
included the strengthening of local communities and organisations
in order to ensure the integration of disadvantaged and vulnerable
people into the economy and society, and the respecting of cultural
and ethnic diversity, the rights of indigenous peoples, migrants
and migrant workers. This last point was very important due to the
large number of migrant workers and displaced people because of
conflict and the economic situation in many countries of the region.
Mr. Nigel
Tarling is Director of Programmes, International Council on
Social Welfare (ICSW)
|