Workshop 1

Co-chairs: Fintan Farrell, President, European Anti-Poverty Network
  Michelle Greuter, ICSW Co-ordinator, Geneva

Poverty and the Copenhagen Agreements


    Tollowing the general debate, it was agreed that the lack of Copenhagen Summit impact on the general public was a concern. It was felt that the Commitments were too abstract. Greater efforts towards the media were required – improving the language, making it more concrete, sending clearer messages.

    It was recommended that NGOs should:

  • Pressure governments to evaluate their actions since the Copenhagen Summit, publish the results in the media and generate public debate.
  • Generate public opinion to pressure governments and also involve the business community.
  • Develop strong alliance-building among all NGOs, e.g. social, development, environment. Also build links with the business community and trade unions.
  • Become more professional; improve performance standards in order to achieve greater credibility and draw funders.
  • Have a clear knowledge of the language used by economists and politicians.
  • Draw attention to the problem of the corrupted and the corrupters in development aid. It was noted that corruption existed in Europe, not only in the developing world.
  • Develop and use the same indicators to measure progress on poverty when dealing with national reports.
  • Place the core conventions of the ILO on the agenda of the WTO.
  • Draw attention to the policies of pension reform of the World Bank.
  • Enforce human rights, in particular economic, social and cultural rights.
  • Raise aid and quality of aid in EU to the levels and targets of the OECD.
  • Strengthen mechanisms and commitments to address poverty and exclusion (e.g. Council of Europe Social Charter and Article 137 of the Amsterdam Treaty).
  • Support other campaigns, e.g. Europe and the World/the World in Europe; Campaign for a Bill of Rights in the EU Treaties; Social Watch.
  • Introduce a tax on market speculation.
  • Call for a European regional meeting at governmental level to assess their progress in achieving the Copenhagen commitments.
  • Build on and strengthen the improvements made in relation to debt repayments.